Ghana's No. 1

Welbeck penalty, McTominay's non-red card explained in The VAR Review

Published on: 08 August 2022

Video Assistant Referee (VAR) causes controversy every week in the Premier League, but how are decisions made and are they correct?

After each weekend, we take a look at the most high-profile incidents and examine the process both in terms of VAR protocol and the Laws of the Game.

- VAR's wildest moments: Alisson's two red cards in one game
- VAR in the Premier League: Ultimate guide

Man United 1-2 Brighton

Possible penalty: Martinez on Welbeck

What happened: Brighton & Hove Albion were 2-0 up at Old Trafford when Lisandro Martinez went into the back of Danny Welbeck inside the area and pushed him to the ground.

VAR decision: No foul, a subjective decision by the referee not to give a penalty.

VAR review: It should have been a penalty. Martinez had no intention to play the ball, and challenged Welbeck with his upper body, forcing him to the ground. The referee, Paul Tierney, may not have seen the nature of Martinez's challenge. But the VAR, John Brooks, decided Tierney had made no "clear and obvious error" not to award a penalty.

The Premier League said before the season began that it would continue with its high bar over interventions, doubling down on its policy of last season, and it's situations such as this where it's tested to its limit. There wasn't a single VAR overturn across the opening weekend, when the average is usually just under one every three games; that probably tells its own story.

In the German Bundesliga, they are going the other way. Rather than having such a high bar, they have instructed the VAR to tell the referee to "have another look" at situations where they may change their mind if they watch it again. In the Premier League, the pitchside monitor is essentially there for a referee to confirm an overturn. The official still retains the right to reject it, but it didn't happen once last season.

Danny Welbeck appears to be barged over by Lisandro Martinez. BBC

When you have such a high bar, the VAR is effectively looking for reasons to support the referee, rather than assessing an incident on its merits. It's why this penalty wasn't given, and why other incidents won't get punished at times. This high bar for "clear and obvious" removes much of the VAR's own subjectivity to advise a review, and is why supporters get so frustrated.

Would the referee have been told to have another look if this game were in Germany? Probably. We don't want the game to be stopped all the time for the ref to go to the monitor, but it seems the Premier League still needs to work on when the VAR advises a review.

Possible red card: McTominay on Caicedo

What happened: The game was goalless in the 25th minute when Scott McTominay was booked after fouling Moises Caicedo.

VAR decision: Yellow card deemed an acceptable disciplinary decision by the referee.

Editor's Picks

    What's new in the Premier League for 2022-23 season: Multiball, five subs, offside5dDale JohnsonSources: No VAR audio released in Prem yet5dDale JohnsonGuardiola and Klopp get their way, but is 5 subs really an advantage for big clubs?4dDale Johnson

2 Related

VAR review: We will get an incident like this almost every weekend, when a player catches an opponent on or above the ankle after playing the ball. It's absolutely key that point of contact alone doesn't determine what makes a card yellow or red, as force and intensity is equally, if not more, important.

So for the VAR to intervene and upgrade from a yellow, they have to be absolutely certain that the level of force and intensity is worthy of a red card. The decision of the referee on the pitch carries the most weight (which of course loops us back into the high bar discussion).

But McTominay was very lucky to escape being sent off.

Another similar challenge next week might result in a red card from a referee, and that's because whether the referee shows a yellow or a red, neither may be subjectively wrong. It's a major reason why VAR can never give you ultimate consistency in decision-making.

Scott McTominay catches Moises Caicedo high on the shin after playing the ball. NBC

Possible handball and offside: Mac Allister own goal

What happened: Alexis Mac Allister inadvertently put the ball into his own net after goalkeeper Robert Sanchez palmed the ball onto his boot, making the score 2-1 to Brighton in the 68th minute. There was a question of handball by Diogo Dalot and offside against Harry Maguire.

VAR decision: Goal stands.

VAR review: There were actually three separate incidents, as at first there was a quick VAR check for a foul on Sanchez, which was cleared, all leading to an extended review.

The ball did accidentally hit Dalot on the arm before the goal, but due to the change in the handball law in 2021, it can only be penalised if he scores. So had the ball gone directly in, or had Sanchez failed to keep it out rather than palming it onto Mac Allister, the goal would have been ruled out for a handball.

Maguire was in an offside position when the ball came off Dalot, but this was not deemed to have had a material impact on the outcome. The goal came from Sanchez knocking the ball onto his teammate, rather than any influence from the United captain.

Finally from Old Trafford, Brighton's first goal was onside due to the benefit of the doubt afforded to the striker, which was added to the technology at the start of the 2021-22 season. Welbeck's toe was marginally ahead of the last defender, but within the limits to allow a goal to stand. When a decision is this tight, a single line is shown to the defensive player.

Leeds 2-1 Wolves

Possible penalty: Foul by Sa on Kristensen

What happened: Leeds United were trailing 1-0 in the 14th minute when they were awarded a free kick just outside the area. It was delivered to the back post, with Rasmus Kristensen heading the ball back across goal ahead of goalkeeper Jose Sa. However, Sa clattered into the Leeds player after the ball had gone, and his glove made contact with Kristensen's head.

VAR decision: No penalty, referee's decision upheld.

VAR Review: Sa was lucky, because if referee Robert Jones had awarded a penalty, there is no chance that the VAR, Jarred Gillett, would have advised to overturn it. But this is about how football judges the way goalkeepers try to win the ball. Would it be a foul against any other player? Most probably. Contact when a goalkeeper challenges for the ball aerially is rarely penalised, unless it is judged to be with excessive force.

This kind of situation is tough for the VAR, in terms of judging when they should become involved with what is seen as normal football contact not usually penalised within a game. A goalkeeper doesn't have license to crash into an opponent after the ball has gone, but this incident shows just how much freedom they have, and it just falls on the side of no intervention.

Jose Sa misses the ball and collides with Rasmus Kristensen. Ian Hodgson/PA Images via Getty Images

It's different from the penalty Hugo Lloris conceded against Portugal at Euro 2020, with the France goalkeeper catching Danilo Pereira in the head with his fist as he tried to punch the ball clear.

We won't see many occasions where the VAR becomes involved when goalkeepers collide with outfield players in the act of trying to play the ball in this way. That doesn't mean the VAR gets it right all the time, however. Stuart Attwell was the VAR for Brighton vs. Liverpool last season when Luis Diaz was hit by a high challenge by goalkeeper Sanchez after the striker had headed towards goal to score. A red card was not advised on that occasion, when it certainly should have been. It's fair to say the level of force applied in that challenge was much higher than Sa on Kristensen.

There was also a question of offside against Patrick Bamford for Leeds' winning goal, but the technology showed the striker was just behind the last defensive player.

Fulham 2-2 Liverpool

Possible foul in the build-up: Palhinha on Henderson

What happened: Fulham took the lead in the 32nd minute through Aleksandar Mitrovic, but earlier in the move Joao Palhinha appeared to catch Jordan Henderson, with the Liverpool midfielder going to the ground.

VAR decision: No foul, subjective decision that doesn't require an intervention.

Joao Palhinha stands on the boot of Jordan Henderson. BBC

VAR review: In the briefings ahead of the new season, the Premier League made it clear that the VAR would not go a long way back in an attacking phase to penalise what might be a trivial incident. While time is never the key determining factor, the goal came 17 seconds after the challenge.

Palhinha certainly stood on the foot of Henderson, and if referee Andy Madley had given the foul, there probably wouldn't have been too many complaints. But the official had managed the game in a lenient manner throughout, allowing play to continue if a player had gone to ground from minimal contact. It would have been out of keeping to how Madley had officiated the match.

Liverpool fans might also want to remember there was a possible foul against Virgil van Dijk in the build-up to Mohamed Salah's 80th-minute equaliser.

Virgil van Dijk was not penalised after clashing with an opponent before Liverpool's second goal. BBC

Penalty given: Mitrovic fouled by Van Dijk

What happened: Mitrovic went down in the box under a challenge from Van Dijk in the 70th minute, with referee Madley pointing to the spot.

VAR decision: VAR Stuart Attwell upheld the decision as no clear and obvious error.

VAR review: Did Mitrovic make the most of the contact from Van Dijk? Most definitely. But there was without doubt knee-on-knee contact between the two players, and as such there's no case for a VAR intervention.

Virgil van Dijk connects with the knee of Aleksandar Mitrovic. BBCCrystal Palace 0-2 Arsenal

Possible penalty: Handball by Gabriel

What happened: With the score at 1-0 to Arsenal in the 35th minute, the ball hit the hand of Gabriel inside the area.

VAR decision: No penalty.

VAR review: VAR official Darren England looked at the incident and rightly decided that there should be no penalty awarded.

William Saliba had kicked the ball high in the air when making an interception, and it came down over Gabriel's head and hit his arm when challenging with Odsonne Edouard.

The ball hits Gabriel's arm after it dropped down from William Saliba's clearance. NBC

Gabriel's arm was in a natural position, it was not unduly extended away from his body, nor did he make a movement toward the ball in a deliberate fashion. If the VAR had given a penalty for something like this, it would have caused far more controversy.

Information provided by the Premier League and PGMOL was used in this story.

Source: espn.co.uk

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
Learn more